AI model comparison
Compare the major AI models side by side, Claude Opus 5, GPT-5.6, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Grok, Kimi K3 and more , by context window, cost, modalities, and what each is genuinely best for. Calm, sourced, and free.
Cost is shown as a tier, not a live price, model pricing moves often, so always confirm current rates on the provider's page before you commit. Last updated 2026-09-04.
| Model | Type | Context | Cost | Modalities | Open | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude FableAnthropic · Fable 5.1 | Frontier | 1M | $$$$ | text, vision | , | Demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work, when Opus at high effort still falls short |
| Claude OpusAnthropic · Opus 5 | Frontier | 1M | $$$ | text, vision | , | Agentic coding and multi-step engineering work, near the ceiling, at half the price |
| GPT AstraOpenAI · GPT-6 Astra | Frontier | 1M | $$$$ | text, vision | , | The hardest end-to-end work, computer use, and long agentic runs that span applications |
| GPT SolOpenAI · GPT-5.6 Sol | Frontier | 1M | $$$ | text, vision | , | Frontier-grade generalist work now that Astra has taken the top of the line |
| Gemini ProGoogle · 3.1 Pro | Frontier | 1M | $$ | text, vision, audio | , | Reasoning over very long inputs, whole codebases, long documents, video |
| GrokxAI · 4.6 | Frontier | 500K | $$ | text, vision | , | Agentic coding with tool use, especially inside xAI's own tooling |
| Claude SonnetAnthropic · Sonnet 5 | Balanced | 1M | $$ | text, vision | , | The default for most work, reads code like a senior engineer at a fair price |
| GPT TerraOpenAI · GPT-5.6 Terra | Balanced | 1M | $$ | text, vision | , | Production workloads that need frontier-family quality without the flagship bill |
| Gemini FlashGoogle · 3.8 Flash | Fast & cheap | 1M | $ | text, vision, audio | , | High-volume agent loops and prototyping, cheap enough to run constantly |
| GPT LunaOpenAI · GPT-5.6 Luna | Fast & cheap | 1M | $ | text, vision | , | Classification, routing, and extraction at volume |
| Claude HaikuAnthropic · Haiku 4.5 | Fast & cheap | 200K | $ | text, vision | , | High-volume, low-latency work where speed and cost matter most |
| DeepSeekDeepSeek · V4 | Reasoning | 1M | $ | text | Open reasoning at a fraction of the cost of closed reasoning models | |
| KimiMoonshot AI · K3 | Open weights | 1M | $ | text, vision | Frontier-adjacent quality you can self-host, the open model closest to the closed leaders | |
| QwenAlibaba · Qwen3.8 | Open weights | 256K | Free tier | text, vision | A strong open model for local use, especially good at coding for its size | |
| LlamaMeta · Llama 4 | Open weights | 10M | Free tier | text, vision | The widest open ecosystem, tooling and fine-tunes, though Meta's newer open work ships as Muse | |
| GLMZ.ai · GLM-5.3 | Open weights | 1M | $ | text, vision | Open coding and agentic work at close to closed-model quality | |
| Muse GlimmerMeta · Muse Glimmer 30B | Open weights | 128K | Free tier | text, vision | Always-on local agents, 30B distilled from Muse Spark to fit one consumer GPU | |
| MistralMistral AI · Medium 3.5 | Open weights | 256K | $ | text, vision | Efficient European open models for building without heavy lock-in |
Demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work, when Opus at high effort still falls short
Agentic coding and multi-step engineering work, near the ceiling, at half the price
The hardest end-to-end work, computer use, and long agentic runs that span applications
Frontier-grade generalist work now that Astra has taken the top of the line
Reasoning over very long inputs, whole codebases, long documents, video
Agentic coding with tool use, especially inside xAI's own tooling
The default for most work, reads code like a senior engineer at a fair price
Production workloads that need frontier-family quality without the flagship bill
High-volume agent loops and prototyping, cheap enough to run constantly
Classification, routing, and extraction at volume
High-volume, low-latency work where speed and cost matter most
Open reasoning at a fraction of the cost of closed reasoning models
Frontier-adjacent quality you can self-host, the open model closest to the closed leaders
A strong open model for local use, especially good at coding for its size
The widest open ecosystem, tooling and fine-tunes, though Meta's newer open work ships as Muse
Open coding and agentic work at close to closed-model quality
Always-on local agents, 30B distilled from Muse Spark to fit one consumer GPU
Efficient European open models for building without heavy lock-in
Head to head
The matrix answers “what exists”. These answer “which one for me” , each with the honest tradeoff, not a leaderboard.
- Claude Fable vs GPT Astra
- Claude Opus vs GPT Astra
- GPT Astra vs GPT Sol
- GPT Astra vs Gemini Pro
- Claude Opus vs GPT Sol
- Claude Opus vs Gemini Pro
- GPT Sol vs Gemini Pro
- Claude Opus vs Grok
- GPT Sol vs Grok
- Gemini Pro vs Grok
- Claude Sonnet vs GPT Terra
- Claude Sonnet vs Gemini Pro
- Claude Fable vs Claude Opus
- Claude Opus vs Claude Sonnet
- GPT Sol vs GPT Terra
- Claude Haiku vs Gemini Flash
- GPT Luna vs Gemini Flash
- Claude Haiku vs GPT Luna
- Claude Opus vs Kimi
- GPT Sol vs Kimi
- DeepSeek vs Kimi
- DeepSeek vs Qwen
- Llama vs Qwen
- Llama vs Mistral
Go deeper
The matrix is the quick answer. For the reasoning behind a pick, read Claude vs GPT, Claude vs Gemini, or running open models locally. Every category above , Frontier, Balanced, Fast & cheap, Reasoning, Open weights , maps to a use case, not a leaderboard rank.
Embed this comparison
Free to use on your own site , paste this snippet where you want the live, auto-updating matrix to appear.
<iframe src="https://kapyn.app/embed/compare" width="100%" height="640" style="border:1px solid #222;border-radius:14px" title="AI Model Comparison by Kapyn" loading="lazy"></iframe>